Skip to content
Likelier

Action vs. inaction regret

Regularly posting your child's life on social media vs. protecting their digital privacy

If you act

Regularly sharing your child's life on social media (sharenting)

52%

If you don't

Protecting the child's digital privacy, keeping them off social media

8.0%

Percentage who later regret each choice. Bars and full ledger render below.


Family

Last reviewed 2026-05-13

Evidence quality 4.38/5

Eight-dimension review score against the quality rubric . Each dimension scored 1–5.

D1 Source verification
4/5
D2 Source authority & independence
5/5
D3 Regret-rate accuracy
5/5
D4 Source comparability
4/5
D5 Gilovich pattern
4/5
D6 Prose quality
4/5
D7 Caveat completeness
4/5
D8 Sample quality
5/5
Average 4.38/5
A smartphone showing a child's photo post beside a privacy padlock symbol on a plain background
Proxy data — no direct regret survey exists for this decision. Rates are derived from satisfaction scores and access-barrier data rather than questions that directly asked about regret. See caveats below.

Action regret

Regularly sharing your child's life on social media (sharenting)

52%

52% of parents are concerned their child will be embarrassed when older by what is shared (concern proxy, not measured regret)

US parents who post photos or videos of their child on social media

cross-sectional, 2014/2015

Inaction regret

Protecting the child's digital privacy, keeping them off social media

8.0%

No survey measures regret among privacy-protective parents; the ~8% shown is an imputed placeholder, not a measured rate

US parents who actively restrict or avoid posting about their children on social media

cross-sectional, 2020 (imputed estimate)

% who regret this choice

action dominates — Action dominates — most regret acting.

Related decisions

Semantically similar decisions — same territory, different trade-offs.

familyDirect

Child social media account access

% who regret this choice

Action dominates

Action regret 5.4× higher

lifestyle

Share sensitive story publicly vs. keep private

% who regret this choice

Action dominates

Action regret 2.4× higher

family

Free-range vs helicopter

% who regret this choice

Action dominates

Action regret 2.3× higher

family

Rescue vs let struggle

% who regret this choice

Action dominates

Action regret 1.2× higher

family

Private vs public school

% who regret this choice

Inaction dominates

Inaction regret 3.2× higher

family

Discipline vs leniency

% who regret this choice

Inaction dominates

Inaction regret 2.4× higher

family

Indulgent vs restrained gifting

% who regret this choice

Action dominates

Action regret 2.9× higher

family

Family meals

% who regret this choice

Inaction dominates

Inaction regret 6.9× higher

Among US parents of children age four and under, 52% are concerned their child might be embarrassed when older by what is shared about them on social media, and roughly two-thirds are concerned about private information (68%) or photos (67%) being found, according to the C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health (fielded 2014, n=569). These are concerns about a hypothetical future, not retrospective regret, and they coexist with continued sharing: a 2020 Pew Research Center survey found that 82% of social-media-using parents have posted photos, videos, or information about their children, yet only 16% say they worry sometimes or often that their child will later be upset about it. On the inaction side, no published survey directly asks non-sharing parents whether they regret their restraint. The ~8% shown for that side is an imputed placeholder, not a measured rate; the entry is flagged as a proxy comparison.

The decision differs structurally from most regret pairs because its full consequences unfold over years, not weeks. A child photographed extensively in infancy cannot consent and may, at age 12 or 16, discover years of publicly archived posts depicting their private developmental milestones, childhood embarrassments, or medical experiences. Once content is indexed, screenshot, or held by third-party data brokers, deletion from the original platform does not reliably remove it. The Mott Poll was fielded in late 2014, before the normalization of Stories, Reels, and TikTok — current sharenting rates are substantially higher, and the volume of archived content per child has grown accordingly.

Gilovich and Medvec’s temporal asymmetry research predicts that action regrets are more vivid in the short term but that inaction regrets accumulate over time. Sharenting is unusual in that the short-term feedback is consistently positive (social validation, likes, grandparent engagement) while the long-term cost accrues to the child, not the parent. This feedback mismatch — positive reinforcement at time of posting, negative consequence to a third party years later — may cause parents to systematically underestimate action-side regret at the moment of decision and encounter it only retrospectively, when the child is old enough to object.

Sources: action

Claim ledger

Every number below is what each source reported, with the verbatim quote we relied on and how we arrived at our figure. Click any link to verify directly.

1/2 sources independently verified verbatim against the cited source

  1. [1] C.S. Mott Children's Hospital National Poll on Children's Health — Parents on Social Media: Likes and Dislikes of Sharenting
    Parents on Social Media: Likes and Dislikes of Sharenting
    Statistic
    52% of parents are concerned that, when older, their child might be embarrassed about what has been shared on social media; 68% are concerned about private information about their child being found, and 67% about photos being shared
    Excerpt
    “"More than two-thirds of parents are concerned about someone finding out private information about their child (68%) or sharing photos of their child (67%). Over half (52%) are concerned that, when older, their child might be embarrassed about what is shared on social media." ”
    Source data from
    2015-03-16
    Accessed
    2026-06-30
    Calculation
    C.S. Mott Children's Hospital National Poll on Children's Health, Vol. 23 Issue 2 ("Parents on Social Media: Likes and Dislikes of Sharenting"), survey fielded November/December 2014, N=569 parents of children age 4 and under. Nationally representative US sample. The 52% captures parents concerned that their child might be embarrassed about shared content when older -- the side label is a forward-looking concern about future embarrassment, not a direct "I regret what I posted" question. The 0.52 numeral is the poll's verbatim embarrassment-concern reading but is a concern proxy, not measured regret.
  2. [2] Pew Research Center — Parents' attitudes -- and experiences -- related to digital technology Verified
    Parents' attitudes -- and experiences -- related to digital technology
    Statistic
    82% of parents who use social media have posted photos, videos or other information about their children on these sites; 16% say they sometimes or often worry their children might be upset in the future about what was posted (83% rarely or never worry)
    Excerpt
    “"82% of parents who use social media say they have posted photos, videos or other information about their children on these sites. ... The majority of parents who share photos, videos and information about their children on social media say they rarely or never (83%) worry that in the future their children might be upset about the things they posted about them on social media sites. Just 16% say they worry about this sometimes or often." ”
    Source data from
    2020-07-28
    Accessed
    2026-06-30
    Verification
    Excerpt independently re-fetched and confirmed word-for-word against the cited source during our grounding audit.
    Calculation
    Pew Research Center, "Parenting Children in the Age of Screens" (American Trends Panel Wave 63, fielded March 2-15, 2020). Documents that sharenting is near-universal among social-media-using parents (82% have posted about their children) while only a 16% minority worry sometimes/often that their child will later be upset -- a lower self-reported worry rate than the Mott concern figures. Used as corroborating evidence on the action side, not in rate arithmetic.

Sources: inaction

Claim ledger

Every number below is what each source reported, with the verbatim quote we relied on and how we arrived at our figure. Click any link to verify directly.

  1. [1] Pew Research Center — Parenting Children in the Age of Screens
    Parenting Children in the Age of Screens

    See all 2 Likelier entries citing this source →

    Statistic
    Among parents whose under-12 child uses a voice-activated assistant, about 39% are at least somewhat concerned about the data the assistant collects about their child (11% very concerned)
    Excerpt
    “"About four-in-ten parents of a child age 11 or younger who uses or interacts with a voice-activated assistant (39%) say they are at least somewhat concerned about the data these assistants collect about their child, including 11% who say they are very concerned." ”
    Source data from
    2020-07-28
    Accessed
    2026-06-30
    Calculation
    Pew Research Center, "Parenting Children in the Age of Screens" (American Trends Panel Wave 63, fielded March 2-15, 2020). This source documents that parental concern about child data collection is real but partial (39% concerned about voice-assistant data among the relevant subgroup) -- it establishes the motivation behind privacy protection. It does NOT measure regret among privacy-protective parents. No published survey asks non-sharing parents whether they regret their restraint, so the inaction side carries no reliable regret estimate (see regret_display).

Caveats

Both rates on this entry are proxies, not measured regret -- the entry is flagged proxy_only. The action-side figure captures parental CONCERN, not retrospective regret: 52% of parents in the C.S. Mott poll said they were concerned their child might be embarrassed when older by what is shared, and the same poll found 68%/67% concerned about private information or photos. These are forward-looking worries, not "I regret specific posts" answers, and many parents who voiced them kept sharing (Pew finds 82% of social-media-using parents have posted about their children, yet only 16% worry sometimes or often that their child will later be upset). The inaction-side 8% is NOT a measured rate: no published survey asks privacy-protective parents whether they regret their restraint, so the numeral is an imputed placeholder retained only because the schema requires a number -- treat the inaction side as having no reliable regret estimate. A distinctive feature of this decision is that regret may intensify as the child ages: children photographed extensively in early childhood cannot consent to their digital footprint and may later object to years of publicly archived posts. Content posted to platforms between 2010 and 2025 is likely to persist indefinitely even after deletion, given archiving, screenshots, and third-party data brokers. The Mott Poll was conducted in 2015, before the widespread normalization of Instagram Stories, TikTok, and BeReal-style spontaneous sharing -- sharenting rates and subsequent concerns have likely increased since then.

Raw data: /api/decisions.json

Recently viewed on this device