Evidence quality 4.38/5
Eight-dimension review score against the quality rubric . Each dimension scored 1–5.
- D1 Source grounding
- 4/5
- D2 Source authority
- 5/5
- D3 Arithmetic
- 3/5
- D4 Uncertainty
- 4/5
- D5 Scope
- 5/5
- D6 Prose
- 5/5
- D7 Perception honesty
- 4/5
- D8 Caveat completeness
- 5/5
● your factors — click this risk ▾ to reveal
- Your factors
≈ As likely as
Perceived
Most people think of workplace bullying as uncommon or confined to particularly dysfunctional organizations. It lacks the cultural salience of school bullying and is rarely discussed in mainstream media outside of extreme cases. The absence of federal anti-bullying legislation in the US reinforces the perception that it is a minor interpersonal nuisance rather than a systemic occupational hazard. When asked, most workers guess the prevalence is in the single digits — far below the actual rate.
Rough estimate: ~1 in 10 to 1 in 20 workers, intuitively
Source: editorial intuition, not polled
Actual
~30% of US workers report being bullied at work (WBI 2024)
US adult workforce (~165 million employed)
Show derivation
The 2024 Workplace Bullying Institute (WBI) survey found that 32% of adult Americans report being directly bullied at work, with an additional 14% witnessing it. The 2017 WBI survey found 19% directly bullied and 19% witnessing. Nielsen & Einarsen's meta-analysis (2010) estimated a global prevalence of ~15% using behavioral measures and ~11% using self-labeling. Using a central point-in-time prevalence of ~30% (the 2024 WBI figure, which asks about lifetime experience in any job) as the headline, and adjusting for career duration: if the annual incidence rate is roughly 8-10% (proportion of workers experiencing new bullying in any given year), then over a 40-year career the probability of experiencing at least one episode is: 1 - (1 - 0.08)^40 ≈ 0.96 using the high end, or 1 - (1 - 0.016)^40 ≈ 0.48 using a more conservative annual incidence of ~1.6% (derived from cross-sectional prevalence of ~15% divided by average episode duration of ~9 years). The 9-year average is derived from dividing the ~32% point prevalence (WBI) by an estimated ~3.5% annual incidence onset rate, yielding an implied average duration of ~9 years. This is a modeling estimate, not a directly measured figure. The 40-year career horizon is used instead of the site's standard 59-year adult lifetime because workplace exposure ends at retirement; compounding beyond the working years would overstate the risk. The central estimate of 48% is conservative, reflecting the meta-analytic rather than the WBI figure.
Caveats: Prevalence estimates for workplace bullying vary by a factor of three depending …
Prevalence estimates for workplace bullying vary by a factor of three depending on the measurement instrument, the definition threshold, and whether the question asks about current experience or career history. The WBI's 32% figure is at the high end of the range and uses a broad self-report methodology with a small sample (N=1,024). The meta-analytic figure of ~15% is more conservative but pools studies from many countries with different labor-law environments. The "lifetime" estimate of ~48% depends on a modeled annual incidence rate that is itself uncertain. Unlike most entries on this site, this is a prevalence entry — it asks about the probability of experiencing something unpleasant, not dying from it. The severity spectrum is wide: it ranges from chronic social exclusion to sustained psychological abuse with lasting health consequences. The 87% of Americans who support anti-bullying workplace legislation (WBI 2024) suggests broad awareness that the problem is real, even if most people underestimate how common it is.
Related risks
Other risks on similar themes — for exploring related fears.
Whistleblower retaliation
What are the odds of facing retaliation if you report workplace misconduct?
What is the chance I will become too disabled to work before I retire?
What is the chance I will become too disabled to work before I retire?
Forced job exit before retirement
How likely is a worker over 50 to be pushed out of their job before they planned to retire?
Subprime auto-loan repossession
If you take out a long-term subprime auto loan, how likely is the car to end up repossessed?
Pick challenger
The 2024 Workplace Bullying Institute survey found that 32% of US workers report being directly bullied at work, with another 14% witnessing it — 46% affected in total. Meta-analytic estimates using behavioral measures converge on a cross-sectional prevalence of about 15% at any given time (Nielsen & Einarsen, 2010; N=130,973). Compounding a conservative annual incidence rate over a 40-year career gives a lifetime probability of roughly 48%, or about 1 in 2. That puts workplace bullying in the same probability neighborhood as developing a diagnosable mental health disorder over a lifetime.
The gap between perception and reality runs in the opposite direction from most entries on this site: people underestimate this risk, not overestimate it. There is no federal anti-bullying statute in the US (the model “Healthy Workplace Bill,” first introduced in California in 2003, has since been introduced in 32 state legislatures without being enacted anywhere — only Puerto Rico has passed a distinct anti-harassment statute, and California and Utah require only employer training), no ICD code for workplace bullying, and no mandatory employer reporting. The result is a hazard that is simultaneously widespread and statistically invisible. The health consequences, however, are well-documented: a 2015 meta-analysis pooling more than 115,000 workers links workplace bullying to symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress-related psychological complaints — associations typically seen with much more dramatic events.
Where these numbers need qualification: the WBI survey uses self-report with a broad definition and a modest sample size. The meta-analytic figure is more conservative but pools data from countries with very different workplace norms. The lifetime estimate depends on a modeled incidence rate. And severity varies enormously — the 32% who report “being bullied” includes everything from chronic social exclusion to sustained psychological abuse, and the health consequences track severity. The number is real, but the experience it describes is not uniform.
Related tidbits
65% of students experience bullying in grades 6-12. 48% of adults experience workplace bullying over a career. Graduation changes the setting, not the probability.
Claim ledger
Every number below is what each source reported, with the verbatim quote we relied on and how we arrived at our figure. Click any link to verify directly.
2/4 sources independently verified verbatim against the cited source
-
[1] Workplace Bullying Institute / Zogby Analytics — 2024 WBI U.S. Workplace Bullying Survey
2024 WBI U.S. Workplace Bullying Survey- Statistic
32% of US adult workers report being directly bullied at work; 46% are affected (bullied + witnessed); estimated 52.2 million Americans bullied- Excerpt
“"32% of adult Americans report being directly bullied at work; an additional 14% witness it. This means 46% are 'Affected.' 26% had no direct or indirect experience with bullying, but were 'believers,' and 72% of Americans are 'aware' of workplace bullying." ”
- Source data from
- 2024-10-01
- Accessed
- 2026-04-18 · archived copy
- Calculation
- The 2024 WBI survey was conducted by Zogby Analytics (September 23-25, 2024) with a nationally representative sample of 1,024 US adults over age 18. The 32% figure represents self-reported direct bullying experience across the respondent's career (not limited to current job). This is the highest prevalence figure among the major surveys and forms the upper bound for the native estimate. The 30% native display figure rounds down slightly. For lifetime normalization, I use the more conservative meta-analytic cross-sectional prevalence of ~15% with an assumed average episode duration to derive an annual incidence rate, then compound over a 40-year career.
-
[2] Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (British Psychological Society) — The impact of methodological moderators on prevalence rates of workplace bullying: A meta-analysis
The impact of methodological moderators on prevalence rates of workplace bullying: A meta-analysis- Statistic
Global cross-sectional prevalence of ~15% using behavioral experience methods, ~11% using self-labeling methods; based on 102 estimates from 86 samples (N=130,973)- Excerpt
“"The meta-analysis accumulated 102 prevalence estimates from 86 independent samples. The overall weighted mean prevalence rate was 14.6% using behavioral experience methods." ”
- Source data from
- 2010-03-01
- Accessed
- 2026-04-18 · archived copy
- Calculation
- Nielsen & Einarsen (2010) is the most rigorous prevalence meta-analysis in the field, covering 130,973 respondents across 86 samples. The 15% behavioral-experience figure captures respondents who report specific bullying behaviors (e.g., being excluded, ridiculed, given impossible deadlines) without requiring them to self-label as "bullied." This is generally considered more methodologically sound than self-labeling. For the lifetime calculation: if ~15% of workers are experiencing bullying at any given time and the average duration of a bullying episode is ~2-3 years, the annual "new episode" incidence is roughly 15% / 9 ≈ 1.6% (using ~9 years as the average tenure in a given bullying situation, which accounts for prolonged exposure). Over 40 years: 1 - (1 - 0.016)^40 ≈ 0.48.
- Independence
- The meta-analysis synthesizes studies from multiple countries and methodologies, independent from the WBI's US-specific survey.
-
[3] PLoS One (2015) — Workplace Bullying and Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis on Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data Verified
Workplace Bullying and Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis on Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data- Statistic
Cross-sectional meta-analysis found workplace bullying positively associated with symptoms of depression (r=.28), anxiety (r=.34), and stress-related psychological complaints (r=.37); longitudinal data show bullying relates to later mental-health complaints- Excerpt
“"The cross-sectional data (65 effect sizes, N = 115.783) showed positive associations between workplace bullying and symptoms of depression (r = .28, 95% CI = .23–.34), anxiety (r = .34, 95% CI = .29–.40) and stress-related psychological complaints (r = .37, 95% CI = .30–.44)." ”
- Source data from
- 2015-08-18
- Accessed
- 2026-04-18 · archived copy
- Verification
- Excerpt independently re-fetched and confirmed word-for-word against the cited source during our grounding audit.
- Calculation
- This source is used primarily for the health-outcome context rather than prevalence. The meta-analysis pooled 65 cross-sectional effect sizes (N=115,783) plus longitudinal data (26 effect sizes, N=54,450) drawn from 48 samples across 42 articles, establishing that workplace bullying is not merely unpleasant but is associated with clinically significant mental health outcomes (depression r=.28, anxiety r=.34, stress-related complaints r=.37), reinforcing the "underrated" myth framing.
-
[4] Healthy Workplace Campaign (New Workplace Institute / Suffolk University Law School) — Healthy Workplace Bill — HWB Legislation Verified
Healthy Workplace Bill — HWB Legislation- Statistic
The model Healthy Workplace Bill was first introduced in California in 2003; as of 2026 it has been introduced in 32 state legislatures; no state has enacted the bill itself into law- Excerpt
“"Our work began in California, the first state to introduce our bill in 2003." ”
- Source data from
- 2026-01-01
- Accessed
- 2026-07-03 · archived copy
- Verification
- Excerpt independently re-fetched and confirmed word-for-word against the cited source during our grounding audit.
- Calculation
- The campaign's state-tracker page heading reports "32 States Have Introduced the HWB." The site distinguishes states that passed only employer training mandates (California, Utah) or Puerto Rico's distinct 2020 "Act to Prohibit and Prevent Workplace Harassment" from actual enactment of the model bill itself; no US jurisdiction has enacted the Healthy Workplace Bill as drafted. Supports the body's claim that the absence of a federal anti-bullying statute is compounded by decades of failed state-level attempts to legislate one.